The Centenary Institute Lawrence Creative Prize (CILCP) recognises and honouring Australia’s bold young researchers who are taking the risks to ask the big and challenging questions of today – those questions that have most people saying “but that’s impossible”.
This Prize is an exciting initiative that promotes innovation and creativity in medical research and is committed to encouraging a domestic culture of scientific excellence.
For the past four years, the prize has grown significantly recognition and popularity – a 194% increase in applications received (in 2014, 56 applications were received, and 19 in 2012). It inspires and advances Australia’s most promising and talented scientists and is perceived as one of the premier awards for scientific recognition. This year, and going forward, we would like to significantly build its popularity and have it seen as the Archibald Prize for spirited young post doctoral scientists tackling the challenging and bold questions in biomedical research in Australia.
“Exceptional young scientists can be hard to keep in Australia and we hope this award will not only celebrate their achievements but also encourage a domestic culture of brilliance in medical research,”
Centenary Institute Executive Director, Professor Mathew Vadas AO.
“The Centenary Institute Lawrence Creative Prize is a wonderful initiative to award early career medical researchers who are embarking on their independent program. At a time where they haven’t built up the track record to compete with established, senior researchers, recognising their creativity and innovation with the Lawrence Creative Prize not only offers them financial support but also boosts their profile, giving them a competitive advantage when applying for research funding.
I urge Australians and sponsors alike to get behind the Lawrence Creative Prize. You will be supporting our young scientists who have the brilliance to think of new ideas and the courage to test them out, in their common quest to advance our knowledge of the diseases affecting today’s society”.
“I am writing to say how influential and important the Centenary Lawrence Creative prize has become for young investigators in Australian biomedical research.The Centenary Institute is to be congratulated for this initiative, which has brought it great credit and great publicity. It is quickly becoming the premier prize for emerging investigators across Australia and, most importantly, rewards and encourages the beautiful and essential intersection between creativity, logic and achievement in science.I very much hope it will continue, and thank you on behalf of the community”.
“Typically it is early in their careers that scientists are at their most creative. It’s as PhD students and post-doctoral fellows that they generate the ideas that set the pattern of their studies to come. I should know. My collaboration with Peter Doherty that led to our joint Nobel Prize began as a post-doctoral fellow in Canberra.But because early career researchers have no track record, support from the established funding bodies is hard to come by. So I’m heartened to see a Prize whose purpose is to encourage Australia’s best young biomedical researchers to express their creativity. And it just might encourage them to stay in Australia and build their careers here.”
The Prize’s stellar line-up of adjudicators comprises of some of the most distinguished and prestigious scientists around the world:
Geoff is one of Australia’s current –day most creative young medical researchers with his research focusing on how a common, short piece of DNA affects the operation of the brain.
A/Prof Geoff Faulkner of the Mater Research Institute in Brisbane thinks the differences in the way each human brain functions could be determined by a segment of mobile DNA, which has the capacity to insert itself into the genome of individual brain cells. His work may have consequences for how memories form, for brain disorders such as schizophrenia, and even spills over into diseases such as haemophilia, muscular dystrophy and some forms of cancer.
Geoff’s work has been noted internationally and groups worldwide are beginning to use his techniques to check the mobile DNA’s impact on diseases elsewhere in the body. And the US National Institutes of Health has established a special fund to finance research into DNA mosaicism in neurons. Please see the attached letter from Geoff.
Connie’ research looked into the ability to prevent early deaths following stroke with fibre-based diet by using innovative microscope techniques to determine how stroke weakens the immune system. She is now studying how it also induces leakiness in the gut wall, leading to infection and an upsurge in deaths. And the solution may well lie in diet.
On winning the Prize, Connie expressed how it had ‘allowed me to go from a relatively unknown researcher to being widely recognised within the faculty of the university and able to communicate my work to the wider community. In addition, since winning the prize, I have been invited to give seminars in nationally renowned research institutes.
Connie used to partially fund the purchase of equipment required for a small animal stroke surgery set-up, including a new dissecting microscope equipped with a camera so that it makes teaching and demonstrating the surgical techniques much easier.
Also, the prize money contributed to fund novel research into examining what type of bacteria stroke individuals are susceptible to by using bioinformatics tools. The prize money enabled the generation of preliminary data necessary for the application of larger grants of which she has been successful with three major granting bodies.
He has developed a widely distributed, novel software tool that other researchers now apply his statistical genetic methods to their data.
Since winning the Centenary Prize, Jian has been awarded $1.2 million to unlock the genetic underpinning of thousands of diseases.
Jian solved one of the great puzzles of human genetics – why the genes typically implicated in inherited diseases like schizophrenia, obesity and diabetes only account for a small amount of their heritability.
Marie-Liesse was part of the team at Melbourne’s Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI) that discovered the breast stem cell. She then worked to meticulously unravel how and why they contribute to the progression of breast cancer.
She now leads a laboratory at WEHI focusing on lung stem cells and their role in cancer, expanding on her earlier work on breast cancer stem cells and the part they play in spreading cancer.
For further information please contact Serena Stewart at firstname.lastname@example.org or 1800 677 977